Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Gnu-arch-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 51

[Andrew Suffield]

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:35:55PM -0700, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
> >>   While tla is ok as a low-level tool, I've observed that everyone
> >>keeps trying to replace it with a driving script. That's a good
> >>instinct. For one thing, I think that:
> >>
> >>  user--archive--task
> >>
> >>  is harder to read then:
> >>
> >> tla make-archive --id address@hidden  --name archive
> >>
> >> tla archive-setup --project hello-world --branch mainline --version 
> >>0.1
> >
> >You have too much time on your hands.
> 
>   Well, that was kind of snide. You're only new to a tool once. Judging 
> from the
> wiki, _everyone_ has problems grokking the blah--blah--blah format, why 
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That's pretty much wrong.

> not
> support breaking it up? It would be less confusing.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature