[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch.
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch. |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:27:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 06:52:19PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> See cacherev. You're not supposed to build up a long series of
> revisions without scattering some cached revisions along the way.
Note that cacherevs are not so nice if your source tree is very big, because
tla's current approach is to always prefer the cacherev if present, which
can be quite absurd if you've got a two-revs-earlier version in your revlib,
and are using a dialup!
Someone was working on making tla's algorithm more optimal but I'm not sure
what the state fo that is.
-Miles
--
Saa, shall we dance? (from a dance-class advertisement)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Miles Bader, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Tom Lord, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., John Goerzen, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Charles Duffy, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., John Goerzen, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Robin Farine, 2004/02/27
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Charles Duffy, 2004/02/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Robert Anderson, 2004/02/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Robert Anderson, 2004/02/20