[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: FEATURE PLANS: pruning instead of configs
From: |
Jan-Benedict Glaw |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: FEATURE PLANS: pruning instead of configs |
Date: |
Wed, 26 May 2004 14:10:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Wed, 2004-05-26 10:48:50 +0900, Miles Bader <address@hidden>
wrote in message <address@hidden>:
> Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > Of the proposed features, things like "merge request headers" come the
> > closest to being itla material vs. tla core. Perhaps the core could
> > have just some lower-level hooks and the behavior of `tla commit
> > --announce' could be pushed up to itla level.
>
> I must admit, the idea of tla sending email sounds a bit over the top...
*spare-time linux kernel hacker hat on*
I do like the idea. Sending patches by email is a common task,
and it would even be superb if tla could pass proper message IDs
along so that *-patch-nnn would result in a proper thread:)
*hat off*
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw address@hidden . +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak!
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] FEATURE PLANS: pruning instead of configs, James Blackwell, 2004/05/25