|
From: | Aaron Bentley |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: commit --tagging |
Date: | Fri, 09 Jul 2004 13:16:12 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309) |
Tom Lord wrote:
> From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>> Okay, I've basically got commit --base working, but there's no input > validation or qualifying.> So I've got some UI questions:> Is BASE allowed to be a version? > What about a patchlevel? > If no archive name is supplied, do we get it from the > tree-version or the default archive?It should behave analogously to `tag'.
Okay, will do. And -S, I guess.One difference between commit and tag is that commit always has access to logs. I think tla commit --base $(logs -f $VERSION|tail -n) is more useful than tla commit --base $(revisions -f $VERSION|tail -n), but whatever.
Aaron -- Aaron Bentley Director of Technology Panometrics, Inc.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |