[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc.
From: |
John Meinel |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc. |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:46:29 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I can't say I know everything about darcs, I've only read the manual as
part of deciding what SCM system to go with. Obviously I didn't decide
on darcs.
I believe it uses a similar feature to Arch, where every change has an
associated file. And your source is defined by what patches it contains.
So to a merge between locations, is (push/pull) a patch into your system.
I'm not sure what relationships you are talking about that it cannot
represent.
I do know that it has the idea of committing to the local tree before
you commit to some other repository. (Kind of like an automatically
getting a branched mirror) They state that every working copy is a "branch".
I'm not really sure how you say "what do I have that the master
repository doesn't", though I'm sure there is a way.
This is about the extent of my knowledge, so if you want more, you'll
probably need to read the darcs manual.
John
=:->
Miles Bader wrote:
| John Meinel <address@hidden> writes:
|
|>"The primary simplifying notion of darcs is that every copy of your
|>source code is a full repository."
|
|
| So darcs cannot represent relationships between different repositories?
|
| How does it handle synchronization between independent sites working on
| the same code base (or doesn't it)?
|
| -Miles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA/xx1JdeBCYSNAAMRAh+YAJ4zGyVWWcv5O+T6JDfxrSpsIk++BwCgz4Tg
HwKJ036FOfN/sG5bPhRhkrY=
=Jf5Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Tom Lord, 2004/07/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Miles Bader, 2004/07/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Matthieu Moy, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., James Blackwell, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Andrew Suffield, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Matthieu Moy, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Bruce Stephens, 2004/07/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Miles Bader, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., John Meinel, 2004/07/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Miles Bader, 2004/07/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc.,
John Meinel <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Jan Hudec, 2004/07/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Bruce Stephens, 2004/07/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Jan Hudec, 2004/07/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Stefan Monnier, 2004/07/22
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., James Blackwell, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Aaron Bentley, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., James Blackwell, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Tom Lord, 2004/07/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Tom Lord, 2004/07/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Aaron Bentley, 2004/07/22