[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc.
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc. |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 09:38:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> I'm not sure what you mean by "happens not to exist" -- does that
> mean that mean that darcs has no separation between archive location
> and archive name? If true that sounds like a huge lose...
There's no distinction between a working tree and an archive, so
there's no need to create an archive. I don't think it has archive
names, either.
Presuming I'm understanding the documentation correctly, it lacks the
usual concepts of branches and things. Versions of code are defined
by what patches they contain, so two versions are closely related if
they contain similar sets of patches, and the nearest common ancestor
of two versions can be formed by set intersection (and that ancestor
may never have existed). All this requires special properties of the
patches, so they have to be partly human generated, which is
presumably an inconvenience.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Matthieu Moy, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., James Blackwell, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Andrew Suffield, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Matthieu Moy, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Bruce Stephens, 2004/07/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Miles Bader, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., John Meinel, 2004/07/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Miles Bader, 2004/07/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., John Meinel, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Jan Hudec, 2004/07/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc.,
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Jan Hudec, 2004/07/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Stefan Monnier, 2004/07/22
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., James Blackwell, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Aaron Bentley, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., James Blackwell, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Tom Lord, 2004/07/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Tom Lord, 2004/07/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Aaron Bentley, 2004/07/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Tom Lord, 2004/07/22
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc., Tom Lord, 2004/07/22