gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla cat-archive-log downloads .listing files


From: Matthieu Moy
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla cat-archive-log downloads .listing files unnecessarily
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:14:09 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)

Aaron Bentley <address@hidden> writes:

> Matthieu Moy wrote:
>> Aaron Bentley <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>>What version of tla is this?  It looks like earlier than 1.2.1.  1.2.1
>>>and later shoul be a bit better than this.,
>> Yes, that's still a 1.2. :-(

1.2.2rc1 performs better, but still isn't optimal.

write(3, "GET /arch/xtla/.listing HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 
mani.sourceforge.jp\r\nUser-Agent: ar"..., 134) = 134
write(3, "GET /arch/xtla/.listing HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 
mani.sourceforge.jp\r\nUser-Agent: ar"..., 134) = 134
write(3, "GET /arch/xtla/=meta-info/mirror HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 
mani.sourceforge.jp\r\nUser-"..., 143) = 143
write(3, "GET /arch/xtla/=meta-info/name HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 
mani.sourceforge.jp\r\nUser-Ag"..., 141) = 141
write(3, "GET /arch/xtla/=meta-info/http-blows HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 
mani.sourceforge.jp\r\nU"..., 147) = 147
write(3, "GET /arch/xtla/=meta-info/signed-archive HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 
mani.sourceforge.j"..., 151) = 151
write(3, "GET /arch/xtla/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.2/patch-100/.listing 
HTTP/1.1\r\nH"..., 174) = 174
write(3, "GET /arch/xtla/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.2/patch-100/checksum 
HTTP/1.1\r\nH"..., 174) = 174
write(3, "GET 
/arch/xtla/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.2/patch-100/checksum.cacherev HT"..., 
183) = 183
write(3, "GET /arch/xtla/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.2/patch-100/log 
HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: "..., 169) = 169

I don't know whether this is an artefact of strace, but it seems
/arch/xtla/.listing is downloaded twice, I don't think
checksum.cacherev is necessary, and patch-100/.listing could probably
be downloaded only in case of diagnosis necessity. Not sure
=meta-info/mirror is necessary either.

Continue the good work :-)

-- 
Matthieu




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]