gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: bitkeeper vs tla

From: mlh
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: bitkeeper vs tla
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:48:52 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i 
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 11:00:09AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness <address@hidden> writes:
> >     in bitkeeper, a tree is an archive is a tree;
> 
> Does this mean if you "get" (in tla-speak) a new project tree, the size
> includes the entire project history (in SCCS-compatible form)?  That

There is an option to hard-link the clone

--
Matt
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]