[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
From: |
John Goerzen |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:29:48 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 02:12:21PM -0600, John A Meinel wrote:
> A agree, it does seem that darcs wins in simplicity, sort of. The thing
> is it doesn't let you do the things that arch lets you. For instance
>
> 1) How do you tell darcs that you want the most recent version of the
> source tree, with the current modifications then applied (meaning the
> archive is more important than my changes. This updates to the latest
> archive version, and then applies my changes.)
>
> tla update
No direct equivolent here (see darcs pull), but otoh, I can never think
of an instance where tla update has been better for me than tla replay,
and also can't really think of one where it would be.
> 2) How do you state that my changes are more important. (This applies
> each missing patch until one fails.)
>
> tla replay
darcs pull
> 3) How do you say. Well, I've done all these changes on a branch, and
> now I'm ready to commit it to the main branch as one logical merge.
>
> tla star-merge
darcs pull
> 4) Each change I just did should be entered into the main branch as an
> individual change set.
>
> tla pure-merge (theoretical)
darcs push
> I realize tla is not very simple, but some of that is because it lets
> you do complicated things. I completely agree with you that the basic
I'm not sure tla really permits things that darcs dosen't. Can you give
an example?
> having darcs take 1 hour to commit a change is plenty of time for me to
> figure out what the difference is between update/replay, and then I
> don't have to worry about it again.
To make it clear, that is a bug in darcs that needs to be fixed.
-- John
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John Goerzen, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Aaron Bentley, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Jani Monoses, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John Goerzen, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Dustin Sallings, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Thomas Lord, 2004/11/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla,
John Goerzen <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Mark Stosberg, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Robert Collins, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/11/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Dustin Sallings, 2004/11/11