[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
From: |
Zenaan Harkness |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:01:24 +1100 |
> > 2. This approach loses the diffs for each individual commit that was
> > done, at least in the master repository.
>
> Sigh. pure-merge. Been there, done that, it works fine.
Yes it's doable. Yes arch supports all merge styles. No, arch doesn't
have the "simpleton's" UI built in (unless you consider scrounging the
lists for a pure-merge script, after determining that you really _want_
a pure merge script, then testing to see if everything's set up just
right, return to list for help when something's not quite right...).
<both right; rarely black and white; ...>
cheers
zen
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Dustin Sallings, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Thomas Lord, 2004/11/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John Goerzen, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Mark Stosberg, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Robert Collins, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla,
Zenaan Harkness <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Dustin Sallings, 2004/11/11