[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:45:43 +0900 |
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <address@hidden> writes:
> I can buy the logical argument, but if splitting the archives on a
> project basis can help me get rid of the year in the archive name,
> I see little reason not to have a address@hidden, or
> even a address@hidden archive.
I think it won't make any difference -- there's basically no connection
between different categories in a single archive (and to the best of my
knowledge even between different branches or versions in the same
archive). The only issue as far as I can see is the size of the
archive, which given modern disk sizes, only seems to be a problem for
mirroring.
-miles
--
"I distrust a research person who is always obviously busy on a task."
--Robert Frosch, VP, GM Research
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Archives vs. categories vs. versions, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Archives vs. categories vs. versions, John A Meinel, 2004/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions, Miles Bader, 2004/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions, John A Meinel, 2004/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions, Dimitrie O. Paun, 2004/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions, Aaron Bentley, 2004/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions, Dustin Sallings, 2004/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions, Miles Bader, 2004/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Archives vs. categories vs. versions, Dimitrie O. Paun, 2004/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions, Anand Kumria, 2004/11/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Archives vs. categories vs. versions, Dimitrie O. Paun, 2004/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions,
Miles Bader <=