[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
From: |
John A Meinel |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:18:36 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) |
address@hidden wrote:
[...]
And it's portable. ( Written in Haskell, darcs is used on on many
operating systems including Linux, MacOS X, FreeBSD, and Windows.)
-- lode
I just had a weird experience with the "portability" of darcs. I went to
check out the Carpet repository (just to play around with darcs)
http://www.carpetcode.org/get-carpet-darcs.html
I then added a line to the readme, and used "darcs diff". It started
scrolling tons of changes by.
I think it decided that the line endings were different.
Probably this isn't very hard to fix, but I wouldn't call it perfectly
portable yet.
(This was with the darcs 1.0 windows binary.)
John
=:->
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Thomas Lord, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/17
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Mark Stosberg, 2004/11/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla,
John A Meinel <=