[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
From: |
Johannes Berg |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:18:50 +0100 |
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 18:01 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> The patches appear to be gzip compressed plain text files (dunno how it
> handles binary files), which already contain meta information (for
> example the comments). So I'd think adding a patch checksum that is
> signed would be trivial.
Ah. I retract that statement -- I only just learned that patches are
modified. Sorry.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/11/18
- Arbitrary file classes (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla), Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Johannes Berg, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla,
Johannes Berg <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2004/11/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Mark Stosberg, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Brian May, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2004/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Michael Poole, 2004/11/18