Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] i18n (Re: Message translation - basic framework)

[Robert Collins]

On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 11:44 +0900, Tez Kamihira wrote:
> A few days ago, some french translator asked me about i18n status of
> GNU arch. Because my previous request went somewhere far away, I
> re-send it to BUG GOO.
> 
> On the logical ground, my attempt woundn't be complicated at all, but
> it triggers fairly amount of lines in tla's code, so it's almost
> impossible for me to make another long lived tracking branch from
> tom/jblack's main line and maintain it independently for a long time.

Hi, I've looked at this and its not (currently) suitable for inclusion.

It places po data for tla into package-framework, which is wrong :
package-framework is a separate project (think autoconf) to tla.

The correct way is to put common logic, but not data into
package-framework, and the tla specific data & logic into tla itself.

I'm going to see if I can hack something up based on your work though.

Cheers,
Rob

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part