[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Serious problem here
|
From: |
Adrian Irving-Beer |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Serious problem here |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:07:02 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:05:21AM +0100, Ulf Ochsenfahrt wrote:
> The really weired thing is, after I deleted my gfs revlib (only the
> cqs thing), I could check out the latest revision again. Mind you,
> since I use a revlib, I'm not doing cacherevs anymore, so it had to
> go through 139.
Did tla 1.3 upgrade the stringency of revlib corruption checking?
This would be my best guess. It seems apparent that the revlib was
corrupt, but the patch was fine.
I wonder if deleting revlibs or running some sort of checker should
become standard tla upgrade instructions.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature