[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: Re: GNU Arch status update
From: |
Mikhael Goikhman |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: Re: GNU Arch status update |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:13:12 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On 08 Feb 2005 03:04:20 +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
>
> I think tla delete and tla move should go; tla rm and tla mv fit what
> happens for most Unix people and tla delete-id and tla move-id remain to
> fixup any sticky problems.
>
> I'm not attached particularly over which (delete-id/delete; move-id/move)
> of these should be removed but I don't think having both is useful. My
> reason for suggesting that you keep the '-id' suffixed versions is
> because otherwise it is hard to distinguish what the difference between
> 'tla move' and 'tla mv' really is. That makes tla harder for a newcomer
> to approach it.
It is possible that "move" should be re-aliased from "move-id" to "mv",
however I think it is good to have this complete list of 5 commands:
add (alias: add-id)
delete (alias: delete-id)
rm (alias: remove)
mv (alias: move?, rename)
move-id (alias: move?)
I am not sure why people think aliases are bad. cvs and svn have a lot of
them and feel no concern for this.
Regards,
Mikhael.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Miles Bader, 2005/02/06
Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Tom Lord, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Tom Lord, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Tom Lord, 2005/02/07
Message not available[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: Re: GNU Arch status update,
Mikhael Goikhman <=
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch status update, Miles Bader, 2005/02/08
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/02/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, mlh, 2005/02/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, conrad, 2005/02/07
Message not available[Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/02/07
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Tom Lord, 2005/02/07
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Miles Bader, 2005/02/07
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Dimitrie O. Paun, 2005/02/08
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands., Gustavo Córdova Avila, 2005/02/08
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Tom Lord, 2005/02/08