|
From: | Gustavo Córdova Avila |
Subject: | [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands. |
Date: | Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:26:30 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050207 MultiZilla/1.7.0.1j |
Miles Bader wrote:
Yes, I also think that this is the best solution. Specially because Arch is not a "better cvs/svn", but a different type of solution, a better one. You can bring all that you learned with cvs/svn, but don't expect it to work exactly the same way.On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:25:25 -0800 (PST), Tom Lord <address@hidden> wrote:I don't know what that implies unless it's that discussion about these commands might be making a mountain out of a molehill.Well they seem to be the subject of endless bickering on this mailing list. [...snip...] For advanced users and scripts, keep "move-id" and "delete-id" -- their names make it clear what they do, and avoid confusing beginners -- and either remove "move" and "delete", or make them invisible aliases with a warning message or something. -Miles
It's a better solution implemented in a different way, and it should stay that way; not be encumbered with tons of aliases in order to make it as similar to cvs or svn as possible.
These are just my 2 cents. -gca
gustavo.cordova.vcf
Description: Vcard
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |