Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch, baz, bzr, git archive formats

[jblack]

I blurbled:

> Disadvantages: 
> 
>  * bzr (aka bazaar 2.x) currently suffers from the same history buildup
>    problems that bazaar and arch do. 

This is true today, but won't be. In the future, weave will be there,
which should on average have pretty good space savings.*

* I suspect that the performance savings will also be sufficiently good
  to not need anything like revision libraries and arch caches.



> 
> > And, is there any possibility that a new Arch can
> > adapt the git format as is, so Arch can directly
> > operate on git repositories?
> 
> -- 
>  James Blackwell      |   Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed
>  Tell someone a joke! |   you yet.                       - yours truly
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
> 
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/

-- 
 James Blackwell      |   Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed
 Tell someone a joke! |   you yet.                       - yours truly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400