Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch: automatic remove the corrupt revlib revision

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Paul LeoNerd Evans <address@hidden> writes:

> At risk of setting a precedent here, I'd have to agree with Tom on this
> one. Corrupted revlib entries SHOULD NOT happen in normal operation, and
> just brushing it under the carpet like it didn't happen is highly
> dangerous.

I agree as well.  The "sporadic unexpected backup/restore" configuration
which Matthieu described is probably not a very common case.  As such,
it is not enough to motivate automatic deletion and recreation of
revision libraries, IMO.

Thanks,
Ludovic.