Re: [GNU-linux-libre] potentially tained/non-free software

[Sam Geeraerts]

Karl Goetz wrote:
> bacula has a freedom problem
> https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?34578
> - could i get some input on this bug please? Does anyone else agree
>   with jasons interpretation of the licence? if its generally agreed to
>   be a problem i'll report a bug in debian. This appears to be the same
>   as https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=34424 ,
>   so the answer would be good there too :)

I reported http://bugs.debian.org/643703 for Asterisk, where an 
alternative implementation is suggested. I also found this reply from 
Tzafrir in my mailbox, which he probably forgot to cc to the bug report:

sha1.c is also included in e.g.:

* rhash
* sharand

I guess I'll need to replace it with e.g. sha1.c from mhash (copyright
status is a bit less clear, but it did not go through the RFC).