gnu-linux-libre
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNU-linux-libre] Is systemd long-term compatible with software freedom?


From: hellekin
Subject: [GNU-linux-libre] Is systemd long-term compatible with software freedom?
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:35:58 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

As the controversy surrounding systemd is growing, I gave a peek at
Lennart Poettering's blog (http://0pointer.net/blog/) There's a rather
large reading list to understand his goals for systemd.

The article "Revisiting How We Put Together Linux Systems"[0] is
particularly interesting.  As I was perusing it, I started thinking
about similarities with and relevance of GNU Guix's own goals.  Until
the following remark on issues of distros with upstream developers
stopped me at once:

"Since most downstream distributions have strict licensing and trademark
requirements (and rightly so), any kind of closed source software (or
otherwise non-free) does not fit into this scheme at all."

In other terms, Poettering is explicitly announcing that systemd will
facilitate the inclusion of non-free software in free software
distributions.

As systemd is already going far beyond the role of init for PID 1, and
turning into an opaque wrapper around the Linux kernel, with its
integrated functionality that wants to do it all--including enabling
upstream developers to code once, run everywhere (ahem), it starts
resembling "One Init to Rule Them All".

But apart from personal preferences and engineering value, the
increasing dependency on systemd (e.g., in GNOME) will eventually become
a hard problem for free distros if and when the core of the system will
enable built-in interoperability with non-free software.

==
hk

[0]
http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=HAxo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]