Re: Licensing question about the BSD

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 17:49 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Promises regarding distribution are totally baside the point. We 
> are talking about *unilateral* grant, not a contract:

You're a joke. Now you try to drag everyone who reads you into a
circular argument.

I've stated it well before you: the GNU GPL is an unilateral grant of
certain rights.

One of them is, UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, to DISTRIBUTE COPIES, MODIFIED
OR NOT.

ANOTHER is RUNNING FOR ANY PURPOSE. And this one HAS NO CONDITIONS.

But you're nothing but a broken robot.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part