[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU FUD
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU FUD |
Date: |
Sat, 26 May 2007 14:45:14 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> By the way: I agree with your assessment of Alexander being an avid
> observer of what you call "Intellectual Property law" (there is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Intellectual_property_law
> actually no such thing, as there are disparate laws about the items
> grouped under this term). The problem is that he is completely unable
> to draw any reasonable conclusions from his observations: his
> predictions are consistently utterly wrong, and he blames this on
> "drunk judges" and similar excuses.
Do you really want to me post Easterbrook's summary of the GPL (his
"quick look" on Wallace's claim aside for a moment) once again?
I seem to recall that you *agreed* that Easterbrook was indeed
"drunken" at least regarding his ability to comprehend the GPL.
No?
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU FUD, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU FUD, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU FUD, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU FUD, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU FUD, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU FUD, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU FUD, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU FUD, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU FUD, Miles Bader, 2007/05/27
Message not available
Re: GNU FUD, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/26
Re: GNU FUD, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
Message not availableRe: GNU FUD, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26
Message not availableRe: GNU FUD, John Hasler, 2007/05/26
Re: GNU FUD, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/26
Re: GNU FUD, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
Message not availableRe: GNU FUD, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
Message not availableRe: GNU FUD, rjack, 2007/05/26