[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

From: Rjack
Subject: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:32:15 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:
1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's
 source code as you receive it

Were we discussing distribution of source code?
As a matter of fact we were.

I thought the point of the discussion for anti-GPL people is to
enable code grabbers to distribute binaries without source.

Sigh. . . Hymen the point of "GPL people" is to prevent GPL
advocates from falsely convincing innocent programmers that the GPL
license can steal their exclusive rights granted to them by under 17
USC 106.

Rjack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]