Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

gnu-misc-discuss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

From:	Rahul Dhesi
Subject:	Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Date:	Sat, 7 Feb 2009 21:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent:	nn/6.7.0

Rjack <user@example.net> writes:

>I live in a U.S. jurisdiction...
>I will continue to legally interpret the GPL under US copyright law...

You provided a good explanation of why, if you were writing a license,
you might use US-specific language.

But you haven't given a good reason why the FSF, when drafting a license
to be used globally, should make it US-specific.
-- 
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", (continued)

Prev by Date: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Next by Date: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Previous by thread: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Next by thread: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread