[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

From: Doug Mentohl
Subject: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:00:54 +0000
User-agent: BlackBerry8330/4.3.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105

amicus_curious wrote:

.. The issue at bar is the harm to the copyright holder and if he is willing to 
accept the result of one mechanism, i.e. the redistribution of the downloaded 
and authorized  copy, there can be no harm found to be associated with some 
other  mechanism that results in exactly the same condition.

What are the legal differences in a) downloading directly to a DVD and/or b) downloading to the hard drive and then copying to a DVD. Please quote all relevant legislation in any jurisdiction..

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]