[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:11:38 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

Rjack wrote:
The law firms hired by the defendants continue in business in
beautiful, spacious office buildings a fact that may easily be
publicly observed.

Lawyers always get paid. And money is fungible. So as I thought,
this is merely wishful thinking on your part.

As part of a settlement agreement, the plaintiffs are paying the
defendants a rather handsome service fee to publish the source code
on the defendants' servers.

You would like to believe this, and you would like the rest of us
to believe this, but you have no evidence that it is true.

No defendant has ever filed a voluntary dismissal to prevent review
on the merits

Well, duh. Defendants don't get to file voluntary dismissals.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]