Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL

[chrisv]

dr_nikolaus_klepp wrote:

>Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
>> Rjack wrote:
>>> It means source code nonexclusively licensed to the public
>>> without copyright scope of use restrictions.
>> 
>> Which is why the FSF and the GPL reject the term.
>
>you forgot to add "Idiot"

Well, we already have some extremely patient people doing a fine job
of explaining the GPL to the Micro$oft shills.  At this point, I'm
going straight to "idiot".