[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:01:29 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
>The CAFC's decision has not been overruled, and therefore stands.
Wait a minute...I thought Rjack had overruled the CAFC, repeatedly,
under a variety of subject headings?
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, (continued)
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy,
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Keith Thompson, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/03/26