[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:04:48 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Rjack wrote:
Attempting to bind all third parties under the GPL provisions
> is against public policy (unenforceable).
Since the GPL only binds the single person who is accepting
its authorization to copy and distribute the covered work,
what you say about binding all third parties is irrelevant.
Just because contractual agreements are voluntary doesn't make
any illegal terms in those agreements enforceable.
Fortunately the GPL contains no illegal or unenforceable terms.
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, (continued)
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2009/03/29
- Message not available
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/29
- Message not available
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, David Kastrup, 2009/03/30
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2009/03/30
- Message not available
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/30
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2009/03/30
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26