[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More FSF hypocrisy

From: Thufir Hawat
Subject: Re: More FSF hypocrisy
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:03:27 GMT
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:31:50 -0400, Rjack wrote:

>> So far as I can tell this thought process lumps the GPL in with all
>> other EULA on the one hand, and then differentiates on the other, but
>> only when convenient.
> Why? Every EULA (contract) is written differently and should be subject
> to somewhat uniform rules of contract interpretation depending upon what
> jurisdiction you reside.

EULA should be subject to somewhat uniform rules?  If you break an EULA 
with Microsoft, what would be the result versus breaking an EULA (the 
GPL) with Redhat?  I've seen no reason why either scenario would that 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]