[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: SFLC is SOL
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:09:38 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0

On 3/22/2010 1:08 PM, RJack wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 3/22/2010 11:30 AM, RJack wrote:
It is easily verified that neither link leads to the alleged
infringed program source code.

Of what use is a transparent lie?

"Transparent lie"? "TRANSPARENT LIE"???????????????????

Show me a link to the source code for BusyBox, v.0.60.3 and I'll kiss
your lyin' ass on the public courthouse square.

Why do they need to provide the source code to v.0.60.3?
They need to provide the source code to the version they
copy and distribute. Do you have reason to believe that
v.0.60.3 is the version they copy and distribute?

The source code for BusyBox is included in

Most of the stuff in BusyBox v.0.60.3 is derivative of BSD4.4-lite
and is not original work by BusyBox authors anyway.

Any modification in functionality is sufficient to create a
derivative work. It does not have to satisfy any notion of
"originality". Anyone who wishes to copy and distribute a
non-GPLed early version of BusyBox may do so under whatever
license that version permits.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]