[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compliance detection tool

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Compliance detection tool
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:17:04 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0

On 4/18/2010 9:23 AM, RJack wrote:
The erroneous non-precedential Jacobsen decision is strictly limited
to the one past defendant in a nation of 310 million people. So...
what's your point?

That since the CAFC JMRI decision is correct and correctly
reasoned, other courts in like circumstances will adopt the
same reasoning and reach the same conclusions.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]