|
| From: | Hyman Rosen |
| Subject: | Re: Compliance detection tool |
| Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 16:17:04 -0000 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 4/18/2010 9:23 AM, RJack wrote:
The erroneous non-precedential Jacobsen decision is strictly limited to the one past defendant in a nation of 310 million people. So... what's your point?
That since the CAFC JMRI decision is correct and correctly reasoned, other courts in like circumstances will adopt the same reasoning and reach the same conclusions.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |