[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:58:00 -0000

ZnU wrote:
> Thus there is very clear evidence of intent to create conditions 
> that was lacking in the case you cite. And the conditions the GPL 


(from comments)

Let's Think This Through 

Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, August 04 2010 @ 07:56 PM EDT 

Um. You are quoting from a case [PDF] that had nothing to do with the
GPL. It was a fraud and breach of contract case, among other things,
having nothing to do with software.

You don't enforce the GPL with contract law. 

So your comment makes no sense, not to put too fine a point on it. You
enforce the GPL exclusively with copyright law, and there is no issue of
breach of a condition precedent.

Do you know what that means? Here's what condition precedent means: 

condition precedent n. 1) in a contract, an event which must take place
before a party to a contract must perform or do their part. 2) in a deed
to real property, an event which has to occur before the title (or other
right) to the property will actually be in the name (vest) of the party
receiving title. Examples: if the ship makes it to port, the buyer
agrees to pay for the freight on the ship and unload it; when daughter
Gracella marries she shall then have full title to the property. 

There are no conditions precedent in the GPL. None. And there's no
breach of contract. It's all about copyright law. So what is it you are
saying? There's no connection at all to the GPL or what is being
discussed in the BestBuy case. 

He he.

(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]