[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:01:54 -0000

"Further, allowing plaintiffs to now convert their default judgment
against an insolvent Mora into one against WD raises serious fairness,
due process and timeliness issues, particularly when plaintiffs knew in
April 2010 about Mora’s assignment to CMA and CMA’s subsequent
sale of assets to WD. If plaintiffs believed that these were “transfers
of interest” under Rule 25(c) they should have sought to substitute
parties at that time so that the case could continue on the merits.

Instead, plaintiffs opted to pursue default proceedings against Mora,
obtaining an unopposed judgment. Plaintiffs benefited from these actions
by not only getting a monetary judgment, but by publicizing this Court’s
injunction as an unprecedented ruling from an
American court. See Exhibit D. While plaintiffs were certainly within
their rights to pursue default against Mora, they should not now be able
to sidestep due process on the merits of the underlying case by simply
trying to make WD liable for Mora’s default judgment."


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]