[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:01:55 -0000

"Plaintiffs’ counsel, Daniel Ravicher, was aware of Mora’s assignment
and the subsequent sale of assets to WD at that time. Mr. Ravicher
acknowledged in a letter to this Court on May 3, 2010 that he was told
by Mora’s then-counsel on April 27, 2010 that Mora “ha[d] undergone an
assignment for the benefit of creditors in California and is unlikely to
continue to defend itself in this matter.” See ECF 108, fn 2.

Mr. Ravicher also obtained a copy of the Bulletin around this time. On
information and belief, WD understands that Mr. Ravicher contacted CMA
about the Mora transactions and that a copy of the Bulletin was sent to
him on or about May 5, 2010. Also on information and belief, CMA
subsequently advised Mr. Ravicher that CMA was not going to expend the
estate’s limited resources by continuing to defend the case and invited
plaintiffs’ to submit a claim pursuant to California law."


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]