[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:51:44 +0100 |
RJack wrote:
>
> Best Buy Inc. has just filed a 28 page (available on PACER) Memorandum
> of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
>
> Let the the fireworks begin!
SFLC's exciting reply:
http://www.terekhov.de/188.pdf
1. They don't object Best Buy claim that SFC 'agent' has no standing at
all. Ciao SFC plaintiff. Ha ha.
2. Regarding the bogus copyright registration and lack of identification
of Andersen's actual work, the answer is basically "it's all in the CVS
and Subversion logs so go dig it out yourself dear copyright office and
defendants". Ha ha.
3. The rights under the GPL really really automatically terminate on a
slightest breach with no way to cure and the only way out is to beg for
"reinstantiation" of rights. Ha ha.
4. The plaintiffs are really really irreparably harmed. LOL.
5. Dear judge, free us poor plaintiffs from the obligation to post the
security bond... LMAO.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, RJack, 2011/03/05
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, RJack, 2011/03/22
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/22
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, RJack, 2011/03/23
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/23
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/25
- 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/23
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/24
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/24
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/24
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/24