[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

From: RJack
Subject: Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:59:39 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9

On 3/10/2011 8:14 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
On pacer:

03/09/2011 185  MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 172 MOTION
Finding of Contempt re: 171 MOTION Finding of Contempt... Document
filed by Westinghouse Digital, LLC. (Kazan, Barry) (Entered:

--------- I.   Background

II.  Westinghouse Digital Is Not In Contempt Of The Court’s
Injunction Because The Accused Conduct Is Not Copyright Infringement
And Because The Injunction Against Mora Does Not Apply To
Westinghouse Digital

A. The posting of Mora’s DTV firmware on the web is not copyright
infringement because it is required under federal law and an Order
of the Federal Communications Commission

B. The injunction against Mora does not apply to non-party
Westinghouse Digital because Westinghouse Digital has neither
abetted nor is legally identified with Mora

C. Westinghouse Digital is not the successor to Mora for purposes of
the injunction under federal common law

III. Conclusion ---------

Oh mighty, mighty GPL...

In the Default Ruling against Westinghouse, the court found a rate $550
per hour was reasonable for Dan Ravicher and noted, "All three attorneys
have legal and technical expertise in the area of software related
copyright law".

These same attorneys have filed multiple Federal lawsuits against more
than twenty defendants for fraudulent plaintiffs Erik Andersen and The
Software Freedom Conservancy. Both plaintiffs had absolutely no legal
standing to file a copyright infringement suit over Busybox... Kinda'
destroys your faith in the U.S. legal system and makes you want to puke,
doesn't it?

RJack :)

RJack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]