Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

[RJack]

On 3/10/2011 8:14 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> On pacer:
>
> 03/09/2011 185  MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 172 MOTION
> Finding of Contempt re: 171 MOTION Finding of Contempt... Document
> filed by Westinghouse Digital, LLC. (Kazan, Barry) (Entered:
> 03/09/2011)
>
> --------- I.   Background
>
> II.  Westinghouse Digital Is Not In Contempt Of The Court’s
> Injunction Because The Accused Conduct Is Not Copyright Infringement
> And Because The Injunction Against Mora Does Not Apply To
> Westinghouse Digital
>
> A. The posting of Mora’s DTV firmware on the web is not copyright
> infringement because it is required under federal law and an Order
> of the Federal Communications Commission
>
> B. The injunction against Mora does not apply to non-party
> Westinghouse Digital because Westinghouse Digital has neither
> abetted nor is legally identified with Mora
>
> C. Westinghouse Digital is not the successor to Mora for purposes of
> the injunction under federal common law
>
> III. Conclusion ---------
>
> http://www.terekhov.de/185.pdf
>
> Oh mighty, mighty GPL...


In the Default Ruling against Westinghouse, the court found a rate $550
per hour was reasonable for Dan Ravicher and noted, "All three attorneys
have legal and technical expertise in the area of software related
copyright law".

These same attorneys have filed multiple Federal lawsuits against more
than twenty defendants for fraudulent plaintiffs Erik Andersen and The
Software Freedom Conservancy. Both plaintiffs had absolutely no legal
standing to file a copyright infringement suit over Busybox... Kinda'
destroys your faith in the U.S. legal system and makes you want to puke,
doesn't it?

Sincerely,
RJack :)

Sincerely,
RJack :)