[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:34:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Ruben Safir, le lun. 28 oct. 2019 18:53:25 -0400, a ecrit:
> On 10/28/19 6:31 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > It is not a question of reference to human sexuality only. It is a
> > question of saying that a particular (non-)sexuality status is something
> > that shall be fixed, as if it was shameful.
>
> There is nothing be said about anything being shameful at all.
One of the ways the "joke" was presented is
"we believe that taking her emacs virginity away is a blessed act"
which does carry a lot with it. More recent ways of presenting it is
"we believe that offering the opportunity to lose emacs virginity is a
blessed act"
which carries less, is more positive (offering vs taking), does not
specify his/her, but still says that losing virginity is an opportunity,
i.e. virginity is something that you'd want to fix.
Samuel
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, (continued)
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Message not available
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/29
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes (was: A GNU “social contract”?), DJ Delorie, 2019/10/29