[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Was anything changed for jazz chords except for chord-name.scm?
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Was anything changed for jazz chords except for chord-name.scm? |
Date: |
29 May 2001 23:09:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/20.7 |
Amelie Zapf <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Amelie,
> did any changes occur in the hardcoded portion of the chord typesetting? I
> upgraded to 1.4.1 and copied my halfway-working chord-name.scm to the scm
> directory and the additions to the chord name appear all typeset in the same
> place, overlaying. What has been changed so I can adjust? I didn't notice
> until
> today because over the last weeks I composed mainly choral music.
The scm markup text was revised, so that super and subscripts actually
work as super/supscripts; they use overstrike. That's probably what
you see. This means that you must probably use a simple raise and
font-relative-size setting instead of super/sub for all additions.
The good news is, that after this revision, creating scm markup texts
for chord names could be (and has been) simplified _a lot_. Have a
look at the 1.4.x included chord-name.scm, or maybe even the
lilypond-1.3.149.diff.gz and you'll see what I mean.
> Hi to you all,
Good to see you're back.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org