[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Need more detail.
From: |
Derek A. Neighbors |
Subject: |
Re: Need more detail. |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 19:47:53 -0700 |
> Static interfaces are ones for which the IDL is established at
> compile time; DII represents where the interfaces are established
> at runtime.
>
> The C CORBA binding for DII is pretty painful; the C++ binding for DII
> represents where a Whopping Lot of the interface complexity comes in on
> that side.
>
> If CORBA is actually being used, it should be very easy to answer this
> question.
You are correct. Unfortunately I have not been working to closely on
GEAS at a lower level. Since the business rules are not CORBA objects
rather only the API I havent had to even look at CORBA. :) Which is the
way it should be for GNUe. :) I should have said I am not wholly sure,
not wholly understand.
> Is it generating IDL and compiling it at compile time? Or does it use
> DII?
It is just the API. So the business objects dont do anything for an
IDL.
> If there is "no IDL," then this sounds like it is distinctly NOT a
> CORBA-based system, as IDL is the basis for defining CORBA applications.
Its CORBA based but only for transport. Not every business object. I
think others address in detail today.
Derek Neighbors
GNU Enterprise
http://www.gnue.org
address@hidden
- Need more detail., Alejandro Imass, 2000/10/26
- Re: Need more detail., Alejandro Imass, 2000/10/27
- Re: Need more detail., Alejandro Imass, 2000/10/27
- RE: Need more detail., Reinhard Müller, 2000/10/27
- Re: Need more detail., Alejandro Imass, 2000/10/27
- RE: Need more detail., Reinhard Müller, 2000/10/27