Re: [gnugo-devel] Last night's CVS (14 FAILS 14 PASSES)

[Trevor Morris]

There seem to be a few platform specific differences, still.
See, for example:
http://www.public32.com/regress/2002-01-29/?unexpected=1

Problem Status 
global:14 FAILED 
trevor:200 PASSED 

This build should have had no unexpected results.

-Trevor


At 08:44 AM 1/31/2002 -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
>
>Trevor wrote:
>
>> Here's the CVS results diff as of late last night (before
>> patch semeai_1_24.1b)
>> 
>> I believe these are all due to the tuning in patch
>>   trevor_1_23.4.tar.gz
>
>I'm running these too, and I got a couple of different
>results. Missing from your list:
>
>unexpected FAIL in owl:132 (Correct '(1|2) R4', got '0')
>unexpected FAIL in trevora:430 (Correct 'G4', got 'H5')
>
>I wonder why I got these fails and you didn't.
>
>This is with the CVS version right after checking in
>trevor_1_23.4, omitting the semeai patch.  Only the 
>first batch has run, so I may find a few more later.
>
>Dan
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnugo-devel mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
>