[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results
|
From: |
bump |
|
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:15:21 -0700 |
> I think this is an effective approach. See
> these two blunders in game test084 for instance
What is the second test?
At move 175, there seems to be no reason for B to connect at H12.
The mistake looks earlier, around move 170.
Dan
- [gnugo-devel] 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, bump, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, bump, 2002/08/21
- [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Teun Burgers, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results,
bump <=
- [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Teun Burgers, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, bump, 2002/08/21
- [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Teun Burgers, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, bump, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/08/21