[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results
From: |
Teun Burgers |
Subject: |
[gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:15:17 +0200 |
address@hidden wrote:
> At move 175 the G9 group is aready dead. It is in atari, and if
> B connects W takes at H12. Nothing much is changed by white's
> connection at K10.
Of cause ....
Hope I got it right in this second version.
Teun
loadsgf test084.sgf 135
1 gg_genmove black
#? 1 [H8|H9]*
loadsgf test084.sgf 171
# W J13 is a double threat against which B must defend
2 gg_genmove black
#? 2 [J13]*
- [gnugo-devel] 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, bump, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, bump, 2002/08/21
- [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Teun Burgers, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, bump, 2002/08/21
- [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Teun Burgers, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, bump, 2002/08/21
- [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results,
Teun Burgers <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, bump, 2002/08/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: 3.3.6 vs 3.2 results, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/08/21