|
From: | Gunnar Farneback |
Subject: | Re: AW: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :) |
Date: | Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:29:37 +0200 |
User-agent: | EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode) |
Dan wrote: > I also think that WIN should be the same code for the owl code as > for the reading code so if nothing is broke it doesn't matter > if there are some codes that are never realized by the reading code. I agree. We don't want to have different sets of result code names for the various types of reading. If some codes are unused by certain types of reading that's not a problem. /Gunnar
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |