Re: [gnugo-devel] EJ45

[bump]

Evan wrote:

> This patch solves nngs4:450 (in my previous email).  EJ45 is matching at
> B5, where it shouldn't.  This patch expands EJ45 slightly to fix this.
> The constraint may still need some work.

The constraint is:

+; !safe_omove(a) && !oplay_attack(*,B) && !oplay_attack_either(*,c,*,B)

The first oplay_attack seems rather unlikely. How likely is it that
X can capture B after O plays *?

I don't see the motivation for the second oplay either.

Dan