gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gnugo-devel] Joseki variations question


From: Evan Berggren Daniel
Subject: [gnugo-devel] Joseki variations question
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:36:42 -0500 (EST)

I noticed a problem in the game gnugo-3.3.17-ylamaki-200303262305.sgf.  At
move 9, the position is:

   A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T
19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
16 . . . X . . . . . + . . . . . X . . . 16
15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
10 . . . + . . . . . + . . . . . + . . . 10
 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . . 5
 4 . . . X . . . . . + O . . . X O . . . 4
 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . X O . . 3
 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
   A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T


Clearly, a play in the lower right is in order.  However, Gnu Go plays
tenuki.  To what degree do we wish to fix problems in variations like this
with changes to the joseki database?  I think it should be obvious to Gnu
Go that the lower right is the place to play, and there aren't any complex
considerations that it doesn't understand.  Clearly, complex or subtle
variations that aren't quite joseki need to be in the database, but there
is also value (I believe) to keeping the database small and uncluttered.

What do other people think about this?

Evan Daniel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]