[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [gnugo-devel] Joseki variations question
From: |
Smith, Christopher |
Subject: |
RE: [gnugo-devel] Joseki variations question |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:44:00 -0600 |
This is an interesting question, it appears that GnuGo should somehow help
those stones- but I am not sure if that is actually needed.
If black played R2, Q2 would be a good follow-up. If Q6, R6 and then so on. It
would obviously get messy in the battle for the corner but I am not sure if it
is _guaranteed_ to die. But then again I am not an exceptionally strong player.
Is there a way to just 'start' GnuGo from a position like this, but as the
other color and see what GnuGo would think? Perhaps there is a great attack we
know of and just the defense to it isn't in our DB.
-Chris Smith
-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Berggren Daniel [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Thu 3/27/2003 9:36 AM
To: address@hidden
Cc:
Subject: [gnugo-devel] Joseki variations question
I noticed a problem in the game gnugo-3.3.17-ylamaki-200303262305.sgf.
At
move 9, the position is:
A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T
19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
16 . . . X . . . . . + . . . . . X . . . 16
15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
10 . . . + . . . . . + . . . . . + . . . 10
9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . . 5
4 . . . X . . . . . + O . . . X O . . . 4
3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . X O . . 3
2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T
Clearly, a play in the lower right is in order. However, Gnu Go plays
tenuki. To what degree do we wish to fix problems in variations like
this
with changes to the joseki database? I think it should be obvious to
Gnu
Go that the lower right is the place to play, and there aren't any
complex
considerations that it doesn't understand. Clearly, complex or subtle
variations that aren't quite joseki need to be in the database, but
there
is also value (I believe) to keeping the database small and uncluttered.
What do other people think about this?
Evan Daniel
_______________________________________________
gnugo-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
<<winmail.dat>>