Re: [gnugo-devel] [sr #105877] non-conforming to GTP in gtp_final_status_list()

[Stuart A. Yeates]

On 10/13/07, anonymous <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Follow-up Comment #3, sr #105877 (project gnugo):
>
> You cannot be serious with that closing comment. The concept of a GNU Go worm
> is totally undefined in the GTP spec and it would be silly to use it in the
> specification instead of the simple and clear concept of a string as a set of
> stones connected by direct adjacency.

If you have a problem with the wording of the spec, I suggest that you
write some alternative wording and raise the issue on the GTP mailing
list, rather than berate software authors for interpreting an unclear
passage in a different manner to yourself.

cheers
stuart