Re: [gnugo-devel] Some questions about GNU Go's status and future

[Chad Williamson]

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> wrote

I have more prosaic desires, personally, but in the same direction
(probably requiring significant refactoring):

- provide a "libgnugo"
- provide Guile (Scheme) bindings to that library
- integrate w/ SGF Utils (http://www.gnuvola.org/software/sgf-utils/)
- extend GTP to non-square boards

It's encouraging to hear that other work might benefit. That takes some pressure off the more ambitious experimental aspect.

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Daniel Bump <address@hidden> wrote:

Maybe we should leave it as it is. As I mentioned, I surveyed the
I can't make itnd found some with names, some not.
 Let me know if there's anything
I can do.

Come again? I'd like to hear the rest of that first part...

> See if Gunnar is interested. I personally wouldn't have time to work on
> this, but if Gunnar was interested that would be a good thing. In

A good thing indeed!

> any case I'm sure the FSF would be interested in a stronger
> GNU Go. You'd have to be prepared to assign copyright to the FSF.

That's fine.

Chad